Sofia calculates the survey results in code, then compares them with Maya’s sources and completed interview transcripts. Missing evidence remains visibly missing.
Published evidence suggests access and visit occasion matter, while the synthetic survey preview illustrates how preference patterns will be presented once live respondents participate.
No genuine survey response was available at this cutoff. Survey charts and survey-based findings are illustrative, visibly labelled and excluded as market proof. Secondary evidence remains real.
secondaryMedium confidence
Convenience is likely to shape repeatability
Observation
Available location and consumer sources consistently identify access and trip convenience as relevant to repeat visits.
Interpretation
A heartland venue may fit more routine, multi-purpose trips, while a CBD venue may depend more heavily on weekday occasions.
Decision implication
Compare candidate-site access and day-part economics before selecting a location type.
S01S04S06
Limit: Published evidence does not establish site-level revenue.
surveyDirectional confidence
Survey pattern is illustrative only
Observation
A synthetic n=48 preview shows how location preferences could be segmented.
Interpretation
It demonstrates the analysis interface, not a customer conclusion.
Decision implication
Share the live survey before relying on primary evidence.
synthetic-q2
Limit: No genuine survey responses have been collected.
Where evidence agrees
Secondary sources consistently make access a decision-relevant factor.
Contradictions and gaps
Contradictions
No live primary evidence is available to confirm or challenge published patterns.
